Home Abortion Aids & Hiv Euthanasia Homosexuality Lebanon Natural Family Planning Contact Me   
Daily News  
Archives
Photo Album
Arabic Church News
Arabic Church Titles
Arabic Encyclopedia
Catechism of the Catholic Church
Church History
Code of Eastern Canon Law
Code of Western Canon Law
Council for Justice and Peace
Papal Documents
Papal Encyclicals
Paths of the Spirit
Pontifical Academy for Life
The 21 Ecumenical Councils
The Catholic Encyclopedia
The Encyclopedia of Philosophy
The Fathers of the Church
The Holy Father
The II Vatican Council
The List of Popes
The Mysteries of the Rosary
Way of the Cross
Question and Answer
- Faith FAQs
 
Newsletter
Your name:
   
Your email:
   
   Subscribe Unsubscribe
 
Latest Posts
- Liturgy Q&A: Adornments on a Tabernacle
- Liturgy Q&A: Multiple Statues of Mary in a Church
- Liturgy Q&A: Inclinations at the Doxology
- Liturgy Q&A: Honor Guards at Funerals And More on Gestures During the Confiteor
- Liturgy Q&A: Online Benedictions
 
   
Media
-  Voice of Charity Taratil
- Charity TV Live
- Radio Maria
- Voice of Charity Live - Lebanon
 
Slide Shows & Movies
- Psalm 23
- Be United Against...
- You Are Mine
- Abortion
- Mother Teresa
- Promise
 
Calendar
  October 2020  
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Number Of Visitors:
579467
 
Professor Puts Kids' Rights First
ROME, MARCH 23, 2007 (Zenit.org).- Focusing on the rights of children could resolve some of the ideological debates surrounding the family, said a professor and ex-diplomat from Norway.
Janne Haaland Matlary explained her position today at the opening session of the congress focusing on "Rights and Responsibilities of the Family," being held in Rome today and Saturday. It is organized by the International Federation for Family Development.

Matlary, a professor of political science at the University of Oslo and formerly Norway's state secretary for foreign affairs, gave a speech entitled "Can the Family be Defined by Western Politics?"

The professor contented that two opposing perspectives characterize ideological debate on the family. One holds that fatherhood and motherhood are mere social constructions and therefore subject to change. The other claims that the family is a natural institution and thus persists in all cultures and societies.

According to Matlary, both perspectives debate the political definition of marriage and family, contesting what pertains to the state and what pertains to the nature of the human person.

U.N. conferences are privileged arenas for this confrontation, Matlary said.

The professor proposed a return to the classical question of the common good as a solution for these ideological debates.

She specifically considered the common good of future generations. "Perhaps a first solution to the irreconcilable state of the positions delineated in this conference lies in accepting the fact that children have rights that adults do not have, and these rights come before the rights of adults," she said.

Children need care and stability, Matlary explained. If states were to focus on children's right to stable parents and families rather than adults' right to marriage, she added, the debate would move away from individualistic goals.